Photoj – Analysis of Photo exposing the horror of war

Introduction

Photojournalism came popular when photographers could without stress take cameras into war zones. For the first time, ordinary citizens could see the impact of the war right there in their newspapers. It was a critical minute in photography and it turned out to be increasingly more genuine between the Civil War and World War II. The advent of war photography showed the evil of war to the people. It brought the fear of the war right into the homes and comfort zones of people thereby reducing the war. When people saw the images of the war, they began to have empathy toward the war as the dead body in those images could be their family too. Photojournalism has a role in constructing peace in conflict areas

Colombian scholastic Germán Rey, directed a discourse between four photojournalists: Álvaro Ybarra(Spain) João Pina (Portugal), Stephen Ferry (United States) and Natalia Botero (Colombia) in an occasion titled, “Photojournalism, memory and search for truth,”.

In the discourse Natalia Botero believed it is vital to record conflict or war with photographs since it powers people to understand the contention from a different point of view and makes “the conflict more human.” Many people in power approach war or conflict from a top-down method, as opposed to a base- up method, which harms people on-the-ground in strife zones. The specialists concurred that photojournalism can fill in as an apparatus to help fill this hole, moving the emphasis on people who are influenced. Photojournalist has always used images to communicate or tell a story to the public.

First image

Photojournalist; Robert Capa Death of a Loyalist Militiaman, Cerro Muriano,
Córdoba front, Spain
, September 5, 1936. published in the Life Magazine.

The earliest history of war image that caused controversy in the world, is the image above by Robert Capa which real name is Andre Friedmann popularly known as Robort Capa.

Capa was a war photojournalist in the 1900s. Robort was born in Germany but left Hungary in 1930 for Berlin. Capa went to school in Deutsche Hochschule für Politik as a student of journalism and political science.

Later he worked as an assistant in the darkroom at Deutsche Photodienst Agency. He later moved to Spain from Germany in 1933 due to the rise of the Nazis where he shared the darkroom with Henri Cartier-Bresson and Chim (David Seymour).

He covered a lot of war during these periods, example is the Death of a loyalist soldier in 1936 which tagged him ‘the greatest war photographer in the world’. He later died when he went to cover the French war in Indochina for LIFE magazine in 1954 when he stepped on a landmine.

Robert Capa in an interview said he made his original photo of the Spanish Civil War while never glancing through his viewfinder. Broadly thought to be a standout amongst the best battle photos ever constructed, and the first to demonstrate front line death in action, Capa said in a 1947 radio interview that he was in ditches with Republican military men.

The men would pop over-the-ground to charge and shoot old rifles at a machine gun watched by troops faithful to Francisco Franco. Every time the military men would get gunned down. Amid one charge, Capa held his camera over his head and pressed the shutter speed.

The outcome of the shot is the image of a soldier who slumbered downward in a dramatic way. During the 1970s, decades after it was distributed in the French magazine Vu and LIFE, a South African columnist named O.D. Gallagher asserted that Capa had disclosed to him the picture was arranged. Be that as it may, no affirmation was ever displayed, and most trust that Capa’s is a veritable authentic photo of a Spanish minute man being shot.

 Capa’s picture raised war photography to another dimension well before writers were formally implanted with battle troops, appearing critical, if hazardous, it is for photojournalist to be amidst the activity.

Second image

Dead Confederate artillerymen, photographed by Alexander Gardner in front of Dunker Church after the Battle of Antietam, September 1862 published in the New York Times in 1862

The one-day battle of Antietam marred over 23.000 people, making it the bloodies day in history. The Union triumph at Antietam brought about President Abraham Lincoln issuing his Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862. The war started in September 17, 1862, between Confederate General Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia and Union General George B. McClellan’s Army of the Potomac, close to Sharpsburg, Maryland and Antietam Creek. (Vermilya D. 2003-2109)

Photos of the Civil War rapidly ended up well known among the overall population in view of the stunning and realistic nature of the photographs. These photographs gave individuals at home the opportunity they never had to see the wickedness of war with their own eyes. War was all the time romanticized in the Victorian time and these pictures clarified that the demise and destruction were not something to joke or boast with.

The kind of photography utilized during the civil war was known as wet-plate photography. Taking of pictures then was tedious and time consuming. Photojournalist needed to carry majority of their overwhelming hardware, including a portable dark room, to the war zone on a wagon.

The photojournalist Alexander Gardner was born in October 17, 1821 – December 10, 1882. Gardner was born in Paisley, Scotland in 1821. He lived in Washington until his death in 1882. Regarding his work he said, “It is designed to speak for itself. As mementos of the fearful struggle through which the country has just passed, it is confidently hoped that it will possess an enduring interest.’’

This image really caused uproar in New York when the New York TIMES mentioned the images and where to go see them. People were really shocked by the image that they refer to those images as bringing the dead right to their doorstep. The image brought change in the society.

It changed how people saw the war and what ‘conquering the war’ meant (a son losing his father, a wife losing a husband etc). Although the cameras in those times cannot take motion or action images. Gardner still tried to take still images to show the horror of the civil war and in those images, I could see the sadness and vanity in the images. For the images to get to me in this century I wonder how people then must have reacted to the images. Gardner reportedly look 70 pictures of the war within two days

Third image

Image about the Birmingham, Alabama civil right movement. Image taken by Charles Moore in 1963 and the image was published in the Life Magazine

Controversial images have changed the opinion of the public. One of these issues was the Civil Rights development somewhere between 1954 and 1968 all through America. One of these high-clash territories was Birmingham in Alabama. (Goldberger B.& Co 2019)

From the image above police brutality to the people of colour can be seen. This image shows fear and oppression the police man installed on the people and how they could easily use their power to oppress the civilians.

Here, dark occupants and partners always conflicted with white power in a battle to end segregation. Charles Moore, a photographer for Montgomery Advertiser and Life got himself part of these contentions. (Goldberger B.& Co 2019)

This local Alabaman and child of a Baptist minister saw the viciousness and wound up dismayed by it. Even though he caught numerous pictures concentrating on this development, it was the above picture that caught the segregation as a reality. (Goldberger B.& Co 2019)

The violence was fierce, yet normal and easy-going. The picture distributed in Life magazine enabled the remainder of the world to perceive what was going on. 

When the picture was published in the life magazine, it quickly became obvious to the rest of the world what Moore had long known: ending segregation was not about eroding culture but about restoring humanity. (Iveta 2017) The Civil Rights Act was passed a year later, abolishing segregation.

Forth image

Iraqi Girl at Checkpoint. photographed by Chris Hondros in 2005

War photographers still take touching war photographs in these recent times, example is the image above. This image showed the horror of war and how it costs a little girl her parents and almost claimed her life too.

This hard-hitting picture of Samar Hassan occurred in 2005 when the war in Iraq was at its most brutal. Positioned with the Army unit was Chris Hondros a war photographer. He witnessed when the soldiers shot at a family of three thinking the truck conveyed insurgents and suicide bombers.

The soldiers killed Samar Hassan’s parents on their way back from Iraqi city of Tall ‘Afar and she was left covered in blood wailing at the back seat. From the image one could feel the young girls sorrow, pain and fear. The photographer Hondros took the image of the girl when she was taken out of the car. (Goldberger B.& Co 2019)

He turned his camera towards the young girl when the shooting happened. He transmitted the pictures quickly, distributed the world over the next day.

Considering this picture, the US military overhauled their checkpoint systems. They likewise experienced harsh criticism since for what reason would they say they were executing the very individuals they were there to free or protect. (Goldberger B.& Co 2019)

This is said to have been happening, but no media coverage has exposed such issue but with this image the U.S. government regulated the checkpoint system. This image brought people together to know the horror the US army cause to the people

This rapidly ended up a standout amongst the most dubious pictures in the media. You can nearly hear the young lady’s shout. (Goldberger B.& Co 2019)

 Hondros the photographer was killed during the civil war in Libya in 2011.

Other images

One big war photojournalist still cover is the Iraqi war. Although the images still haven’t stopped the war, but they have received sympathy from the members of the public all over the world. Through publishing these images below aids have been provided to the people affected by the war.

The first image depicts the horror of the war on soldiers. Marine Sergeant Kevin Downs, 21 seen in a rehabilitation centre exercising his body. He had a fourth degree born and lost both his leg due to the war. Image taken by Brent Stirton. Alan Taylor (2018)

The second image taken by Ali Abu Shish of the Reuters shows how Iraqi workers cleaned dirt beside a pool of blood of 115 people killed by a sucide bomber and wounding 148 people on February 28, 2005.

The third image was taken by Damir Sagoli of Reutrers in 2003. This image show terrified Iraqi children protecting themselves from the cold after they’re taken outside of their house by the U.S. army during an early morning raid. Alan Taylor (2018)

The forth image was taken by Adem Hadei in 2007. The image shows a grieving woman holding her dead six-year-old boy who was murdered by gunmen in Iraq. Alan Taylor (2018).

All these images were taken by people who felt the need to inform people of the horrors of war even though in the processes they automatically put themselves in danger. Some of these war photographers may be lucky and have a good life after the war, but most of them are always murders or killed during the war.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started